As someone who spends the majority of her time in a state of indignation,

I have a surprisingly high tolerance for things that make other people – albeit,

people I know only through statistics and Time Magazine blurbs – very mad. I

didnÕt really care about Janet JacksonÕs boob at the Superbowl, other than the

specific depravity of her nipple ring; I couldnÕt believe that people were actually

offended to the point of galvanization.

 

The kind of outrage triggered by subversive or accidental allusion to sex (and the

human body in general) only makes sense to me when I remember a mistake I made

in middle school: thinking that ÒWelcome to the DollhouseÓ was about dolls, and

watching it with my parents. I was totally fascinated by the movie, obviously, but

embarrassed for months afterwards for having seen it with them. ItÕs wasnÕt the content

itself, but being forced to acknowledge that we could not acknowledge that kind of

content with one another. After the movie we just shuffled off, ashamed. ÒOffensiveÓ

things are most disturbing in the clear demarcation they provide, the white line they

draw around conversational black holes.

 

 

Dinghead